Cent Eur J Public Health 2011, 19(2):118-120 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3581

Publication Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Nazish Siddiqi
Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Communication of research findings is the utmost responsibility of all scientists. Publication bias occurs if scientific studies with negative or null results fail to get published. This can happen due to bias in submitting, reviewing, accepting, publishing or aggregating scientific literature that fails to show positive results on a particular topic. Publication bias can make scientific literature unrepresentative of the actual research studies. This can give the reader a false impression about the beneficial effects of a particular treatment or intervention and can influence clinical decision making. Publication bias is more common than it is actually considered to be, but there are ways to detect and prevent it. This paper comments on the occurrence, types and consequences of publication bias and the strategies employed to detect and control it.

Keywords: bias, publication bias, epidemiological studies, funnel plot, trim and fill method

Received: August 25, 2009; Revised: May 25, 2011; Accepted: May 25, 2011; Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Siddiqi N. Publication Bias in Epidemiological Studies. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2011;19(2):118-120. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3581. PubMed PMID: 21739906.
Download citation

References

  1. Schlesselman JJ, Stolley PD. Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982.
  2. Gordis L. Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2004.
  3. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1385-9. Go to original source...
  4. Constantine NA. Publication bias. In: Boslaugh S, editor. Encyclopedia of epidemiology. Vol.1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2008. p. 853-4.
  5. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):158-62. Erratum in: JAMA. 1994 Nov 9;272(18):1410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Moller AP, Jennions MD. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2001 Oct;16(10):580-6. Go to original source...
  7. Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1010-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Olson CM, Rennie D, Cook D, Dickersin K, Flanagin A, Hogan JW, et al. Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2825-8. Go to original source...
  9. Campion EW. Medical research and the news media. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 2;351(23):2436-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Gotzsche PC. Reference bias in reports of drug trials. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 12;295(6599):654-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Carter AO, Griffin GH, Carter TP. A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):241-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000 Jun 10;320(7249):1574-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Eyding D, Lelgemann M, Grouven U, Härter M, Kromp M, Kaiser T, et al. Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials. BMJ. 2010 Oct 12;341:c4737. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Shields PG. Publication bias is a scientific problem with adverse ethical outcomes: the case for a section for null results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Aug;9(8):771-2.
  15. Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct;4(10):1529-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Abaid LN, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Reducing publication bias through trial registration. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. World Health Organization. International ClinicalTrials Registry Platform (ICTRP) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO [cited 2009Aug 20].Available from: http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/.
  18. Song F, Eastwood A, Gilbody S, Duley L. The role of electronic journals in reducing publication bias. Med Inform Internet Med. 1999 JulSep;24(3):223-9. Go to original source...
  19. Journal of Negative Results in Bio-medicine [Internet]. London: BioMed Central [cited 2009 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.jnrbm.com/.