Cent Eur J Public Health 2009, 17(3):161-168 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3535

The Impact of Teaching Physical Education to Czech School Children Using Progressive Teaching Approaches: Findings of a Four-year Study

Karel Frömel1, Walid El Ansari2, Jana Vašíčková1
1 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Sport, Health and Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, United Kingdom

Practice teaching is an important feature of pre-professional preparation of teachers. This study assessed student teachers' (STs) and pupils': overall evaluation and evaluation of pupils' roles in physical education (PE) and second subject lessons. STs delivered the lessons using either traditional or progressive teaching approaches. Questionnaires were completed by 57 STs and 10,517 high school pupils who assessed the lessons taught by the STs. Differences in the evaluation of pupil's role were analysed according to teaching approach, school years, and gender. In both types of lessons, pupils evaluated progressive teaching approaches more positively than the traditional approaches. Pupils' roles in lessons delivered using progressive teaching approaches also increased. STs evaluated the progressive approaches in both lessons more positively than traditional approaches. Girls evaluated PE lessons more favourably than boys regardless of teaching approach. If the goal is to increase pupils' role in the lessons, progressive teaching approach may be more effective than traditional.

Keywords: student teacher, teaching style, high school pupils, gender, questionnaire, health

Received: October 20, 2009; Revised: April 15, 2009; Accepted: April 15, 2009; Published: September 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Frömel K, El Ansari W, Vašíčková J. The Impact of Teaching Physical Education to Czech School Children Using Progressive Teaching Approaches: Findings of a Four-year Study. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2009;17(3):161-168. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3535. PubMed PMID: 20020607.
Download citation

References

  1. Chepyator-Thomson JR, Liu W. 'Pre-service teachers' reflections on student teaching experiences: lessons learned and suggestions for reform in PETE programs. Phys Educator. 2003 Mar 22;60(2):2-12.
  2. Wirszyla C. State-mandated curriculum change in three high school physical education programs. J Teach Phys Educ. 2002 Oct;22(1):4-19. Go to original source...
  3. Chen W, Cone T. Links between children's use of critical thinking and an expert teacher's teaching in creative dance. J Teach Phys Educ. 2003 Jan;22(2):169-85. Go to original source...
  4. Siedentop D. Content knowledge for physical education. J Teach Phys Educ. 2002 July;21(4):368-77. Go to original source...
  5. Chmelík F, Frömel K, Svozil Z. Student teacher ability to apply progressive intervention in both their majors during teaching practice.Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2007;37(4):31-6.
  6. Graber KC. The influence of teacher education programs on the beliefs of student teachers: general pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and teacher education course work. J Teach Phys Educ. 1995 Jan;14(2):157-78. Go to original source...
  7. Chen K, Tan J, KhooA. Pre-service teachers'conceptions about teaching and learning: a closer look at Singapore cultural context.Asia Pac J Teach Educ. 2007 May;35(2):181-95. Go to original source...
  8. McCaughtry N, Rovegno I. Development of pedagogical content knowledge: moving from blaming students to predicting skillfulness, recognizing motor development, and understanding emotion. J Teach Phys Educ. 2003 July;22(4):355-68. Go to original source...
  9. Penney D, Chandler T. Physical education: what future(s)? Sport Educ Soc. 2000 Mar;5(1):71-87. Go to original source...
  10. LaMaster KJ. Enhancing preservice teachers' field experiences through the addition of an early field experience component. J Exp Educ. 2001;24(1):27-33. Go to original source...
  11. Treasure DC, Roberts GC. Students' perceptions of the motivational climate, achievement beliefs, and satisfaction in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001 Jun;72(2):165-75. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ussher B, Gibbes C. Vygotsky, physical education and social interaction. J Phys Educ New Zeal. 2002 Jul;35(1):76-86.
  13. Cuddihy TF, Corbin CB, Dale D.Ashort instrument for assessing intrinsic motivation for physical activity. Phys Educator. 2002;59(1):26-37.
  14. Mandigo JL, Holt NL. Putting theory into practice: how cognitive evaluation theory can help us motivate children in physical activity environments. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2000 Jan;77(1):44-9. Go to original source...
  15. BoyceA. Inappropriate student behavior - a problem for student teachers. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 1997 Aug;68(6):28-30. Go to original source...
  16. Houghton Mifflin Company [homepage on the Internet]. What is interdisciplinary/cross-curricular teaching? [cited 2008 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www.eduplace.com/rdg/res/literacy/interd0.html.
  17. Carlson TB, McKenna P. A reflective adventure for student teachers. J Exp Educ. 2000 Jun;23(1):17-25. Go to original source...
  18. Bell ND, Lorenzi D. Facilitating second language acquisition in elementary and secondary physical education classes. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2004 Aug;75(6):46-51. Go to original source...
  19. Clancy ME, Hruska BL. Developing language objectives for English learners in physical education lessons. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2005 Apr;76(4):30-5. Go to original source...
  20. Stringer S, Reilly E. Literature circles in the physical education classroom. Strategies. 2004 Mar/Apr;17(4):35-7. Go to original source...
  21. Casas B, DeFrancesco C. Elementary physical education and math skills development. Strategies. 2004 Nov/Dec;18(2):21-3. Go to original source...
  22. BuchananAM, Martin E, Childress R, Howard C, Williams L, Bedsole B, et al.(2002)Integratingelementaryphysicaleducationandscience:acooperative problem-solving approach. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2002 Feb;73(2):31-6. Go to original source...
  23. Altman SR, Lehr CA. Integrating sport, physical activity, and the arts in education. Strategies. 2003 Mar/Apr;16(4):15-8. Go to original source...
  24. Mitáš J, Frömel K. Social and relational interactions in different types of PE lessons during student teachers'practice teaching. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2005;35(2):19-25.
  25. Svozil Z, Vašendová J, Frömel K. Health dimension in physical education teaching units. In: Válková H, Hanelová Z, editors. Movement and health: supplement; 1999 Nov 14-17. Olomouc: Palacky University; 1999. p. 489-92.
  26. Vašíčková J. Individualized instruction in school physical education [unpublished dissertation]. Olomouc: Palacky University; 2002. (In Czech.)
  27. Francis LJ, Grindle Z. Whatever happened to progressive education? A comparison of primary school teachers'attitudes in 1982 and 1996. Educ Studies. 1998 Nov;24(3):269-79. Go to original source...
  28. Bennett N. Teaching styles and pupil progress. 1st ed. London: Open Books; 1976.
  29. Mosston M, Ashworth S. Teaching physical education. 5th ed. San Francisco(CA): Benjamin Cummings; 2001.
  30. Byra M. A review of spectrum research: the contributions of two eras. Quest. 2000 Aug;52(3):229-45. Go to original source...
  31. Frömel K, Vašendová J, Krapková J. Esthetic aspects of physical education classes for girls. Phys Educator. 2000;57(3):146-60.
  32. Frömel K, Stratton G, Vašendová J, Pangrazi RP. Dance as a fitness activity: The impact of teaching style and dance form. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2002 May/Jun;73(5):26-30,54. Go to original source...
  33. Frömel K, Lehnert M, Vašendová J. Volleyball for girls in school physical education. Int J Volley Res. 2000;2(1):30-4.
  34. Svozil Z, Frömel K, Górna K. Individualisation in the professional preparation of the physical education teachers.Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2002;32(1):27-36.
  35. Morse DT. Minisize2: a computer program for determining effect size and minimum sample size for statistical significance for univariate, multivariate and nonparametric tests. Educ Psychol Meas. 1999 Jun;59(3):51831. Go to original source...
  36. Wilson S,Williams JA. Student-created case studies for teacher education. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2001 Feb;72(2):49-53. Go to original source...
  37. Subramaniam PR, Silverman S. Middle school students'attitudes toward physical education. Teach Teach Educ. 2007 July;23(5):602-11. Go to original source...
  38. Rütten A, Ziemainz H, Abu-Omar K, Groth N. Residential area, physical education, and the health of school aged children. Health Educ. 2003;103(5):264-70. Go to original source...
  39. Stelzer J, Ernest JM, Fenster MJ, Langford G. Attitudes toward physical education: a study of high school students from four countries - Austria, Czech Republic, England, and USA. Coll Student J [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Jun [cited 2008 Oct 24]. Available from: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCR/is_2_38/ai_n6124562.
  40. Wright S.Acomparative view of teaching practice in physical education. Int Sports Studies. 1999;21(1):55-68.
  41. Frömel K, Formánková S, Sallis JF. Physical activity and sport preferences of 10 to 14-year-old children: a 5-year prospective study.Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2002;32(1):11-5.